What term describes when conclusions are drawn as part of an argument's proof?

The term that describes when conclusions are drawn as part of an argument's proof is often referred to as a circular argument. In a circular argument, the conclusion is essentially restating or relying on the premises rather than providing valid support for them. This means that the argument goes in a loop without offering any new evidence or reasoning, making it difficult to prove the initial claim in a logical manner.

When constructing or evaluating an argument, it's important to ensure that the conclusions drawn are supported by sound reasoning and evidence, rather than simply being rephrased assertions. In this context, recognizing a circular argument helps identify weaknesses in reasoning that prevent a convincing and valid conclusion from being reached.